会计系2019双周论坛第一讲

主 题:The Myth about Public versus Private Enforcement of Securities Laws – Evidence from Chinese Comment Letters 证券监管执法的公私之谜——来自中国交易所问询函的经验证据

主讲人: 张磊(加拿大Simon Fraser University助理教授)

协调人: 张敏、戴璐

时 间:2019-01-04 13:00

地 点:明商1008会议室

语 言:英文

 

Prior work based on cross-country evidence reaches different conclusions regarding the efficacy of public versus private enforcement of securities laws (La Porta, Lopez-de-Silanes, and Shleifer 2006; Jackson and Roe 2009). China presents a unique opportunity to study public enforcement of mandatory disclosure when private enforcement is largely absent. Using a hand-collected sample of comment letters (CLs) on annual reports issued by the Shanghai Stock Exchange, we first show that price reaction to CL announcements is negative and significant, suggesting that the market views significant deficiency in firms’ disclosure as bad news. We then examine whether the Exchange’s oversight affects firms’ accounting quality in terms of earnings management and disclosure and find no significant effect. Finally, we show that CL recipients are more likely to receive CLs in the future and are also more likely to be sanctioned by regulators. We conclude that in China where public enforcement is the only game in town, the Exchange is capable of identifying significance malfeasance and follows up with more scrutiny and sanctions.


 

人大商学院新闻网版权与免责声明:

① 凡本网未注明其他出处的作品,版权均属于人大商学院,未经本网授权不得转载、摘编或利用其它方式使用上述作品。已经本网授权使用作品的,应在授权范围内使用,并注明“来源:人大商学院”。违反上述声明者,本网将追究其相关责任。

② 凡本网注明其他来源的作品,均转载自其它媒体,转载目的在于传递更多信息,并不代表本网对其负责。

③ 有关作品内容、版权和其它问题请与本网联系。

※ 联系方式:中国人民大学商学院宣传信息事务办公室 邮箱:media@rmbs.ruc.edu.cn

官方微信 中国人民大学商学院 86-10-82509171 rmbs@rmbs.ruc.edu.cn

©中国人民大学商学院 版权所有 京ICP备05066828号-1